ArticleScientific reports2026
Social network analysis for crime prediction under social computing and deep learning technology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Criminal networks feature complex structures and high internal concealment. Social computing methods and deep learning provide a possibility to identify hidden key figures and predict criminal behaviors within them. To this end, a Key Person Identification Model Based on Account Association (KPI-AA) is proposed. This model combines local neighbor similarity and global edge betweenness, and uses graph neural network (GNN) to conduct in-depth characterization of key nodes in social networks. It is applied to reveal potential organizational cores in complex social structures and identify potential diffusion paths in criminal networks. Experimental results show the following: In the dimension of propagation dynamics, KPI-AA infects 34 nodes at 40-time steps in the Zachary network, and reaches 329.6 nodes at 150-time steps in the Harry Potter network. Both results are higher than those of baseline models. In terms of network robustness, after removing 70% of the nodes in the Zachary network, the relative connectivity of KPI-AA is only 0.087. Regarding ranking consistency, the Kendall's tau coefficient on the Twitter dataset reaches 0.467. Computational efficiency analysis indicates that while maintaining performance advantages in propagation dynamics, network robustness, and ranking consistency, KPI-AA still exhibits excellent scalability and practical deployment feasibility. The above results indicate that KPI-AA has advantages in propagation speed, revealing network vulnerability, and ranking consistency. Therefore, the KPI-AA model is practical in identifying core members of criminal networks and predicting criminal behaviors, and can serve social security governance and criminal investigation applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.