Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491265›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Social network analysis for crime prediction under social computing and deep learning technology.

Xinghua Cao, Lin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xinghua CaoSchool of Humanities, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 102488, China.
Lin ZhangInternational College, Krirk University, Bangkok, 10220, Thailand. zhanglin97832023@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Criminal networks feature complex structures and high internal concealment. Social computing methods and deep learning provide a possibility to identify hidden key figures and predict criminal behaviors within them. To this end, a Key Person Identification Model Based on Account Association (KPI-AA) is proposed. This model combines local neighbor similarity and global edge betweenness, and uses graph neural network (GNN) to conduct in-depth characterization of key nodes in social networks. It is applied to reveal potential organizational cores in complex social structures and identify potential diffusion paths in criminal networks. Experimental results show the following: In the dimension of propagation dynamics, KPI-AA infects 34 nodes at 40-time steps in the Zachary network, and reaches 329.6 nodes at 150-time steps in the Harry Potter network. Both results are higher than those of baseline models. In terms of network robustness, after removing 70% of the nodes in the Zachary network, the relative connectivity of KPI-AA is only 0.087. Regarding ranking consistency, the Kendall's tau coefficient on the Twitter dataset reaches 0.467. Computational efficiency analysis indicates that while maintaining performance advantages in propagation dynamics, network robustness, and ranking consistency, KPI-AA still exhibits excellent scalability and practical deployment feasibility. The above results indicate that KPI-AA has advantages in propagation speed, revealing network vulnerability, and ranking consistency. Therefore, the KPI-AA model is practical in identifying core members of criminal networks and predicting criminal behaviors, and can serve social security governance and criminal investigation applications.

Indexed as

Crime predictionDeep learningKey person identificationSocial computingSocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID41491265
PMCPMC12873403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.