ArticleNature biotechnology2026
CRISPR-Cas3-based editing for targeted deletions in a mouse model of transthyretin amyloidosis.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Gigabase-scale deletion scanning of the human genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Application of Omics Analysis in the Clinical Practice and Research of Transthyretin Amyloidosis.Genes · 2026Review
- Beyond a gatekeeper: the non-classical signaling role of STRA6 in driving endothelial senescence and atherosclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas3 represents a mechanistically distinct genome-editing system compared to Cas9 that generates long-range deletions rather than small indels, thereby reducing the risk of residual protein function from in-frame mutations. Here we evaluated CRISPR-Cas3 to correct mutations in the TTR gene causing transthyretin amyloidosis, a systemic proteinopathy where loss of mutant TTR in the liver offers therapeutic benefit. Through CRISPR RNA optimization we achieved 58.9% ± 0.5% editing at the TTR locus in vitro, inducing large deletions that abolished TTR expression. Cas3 generated mostly directional deletions up to 75 kb without reproducible off-target mutations, in contrast to Cas9, which induced indels at several off-target sites. In vivo, a single lipid-nanoparticle-based treatment achieved 48.7% ± 1.1% hepatic editing and reduced serum TTR levels by 80.1% ± 4.6%. Deletion size was limited to 21 kb. In TTR exon-humanized mice, Cas3 editing reduced serum TTR without in-frame mutations and attenuated macrophage-associated TTR deposition. These findings highlight Cas3 as an efficient and distinct sytem for in vivo genome editing.
Identifiers
41491255What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.