ArticleNature biotechnology2026
Revealing a coherent cell-state landscape across single-cell datasets with CONCORD.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Beyond phenotypic markers: rethinking dopaminergic identity in iPSC-derived neurons.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Review
- A consensus atlas of human brain development defines cell type-specific maturation trajectories across the lifespan.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- ENS lineage potential is not intrinsically regionalized but is modulated by PTPRZ1 signaling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Revealing the underlying cell-state landscape from single-cell data requires overcoming the critical obstacles of batch integration, denoising and dimensionality reduction. Here we present CONCORD, a unified framework that simultaneously addresses these challenges within a single self-supervised model. At its core, CONCORD implements a probabilistic sampling strategy that corrects batch effects through dataset-aware sampling and enhances biological resolution through hard-negative sampling. Using only a minimalist neural network with a single hidden layer and contrastive learning, CONCORD surpasses state-of-the-art performance without relying on deep architectures, auxiliary losses or external supervision. It seamlessly integrates data across batches, technologies and even species to generate high-resolution cell atlases. The resulting latent representations are denoised and biologically meaningful, capturing gene coexpression programs, revealing detailed lineage trajectories and preserving both local geometric relationships and global topological structures. We demonstrate CONCORD's broad applicability across diverse datasets, establishing it as a general-purpose framework for learning unified, high-fidelity representations of cellular identity and dynamics.
Identifiers
41491253What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.