ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2026
Νovel methylation biomarkers in liquid biopsy and classifying biosignatures for the clinical management of breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evolution of the Use of Circulating DNA as a Biomarker in Neoadjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast Cancer (BrCa) remains a devastating disease presenting emerging needs for effective management. Recently, epigenetic biomarkers are assessed in liquid biopsy for diagnostic and prognostic applications. This study applies a 3-step data-driven biomarker discovery pipeline to identify robust methylation biomarkers and generate high-performance biosignatures specific for clinically significant BrCa end-points, followed by laboratory validation in patient cell-free DNA (cfDNA).
methodsPublicly available genome-wide methylomes from 520 BrCa and 185 non-diseased breast tissues (discovery dataset) were analyzed via Automated Machine Learning (AutoML, JADBio) to identify BrCa-specifically methylated promoters. Bioinformatic search revealed any BrCa biological relevance. Next, the methylation of identified promoters was experimentally validated in plasma cfDNA from 195 BrCa patients and 135 healthy individuals by Methylation Specific qPCR (qMSP) (validation cohort). Finally, autoML analyzed experimental and clinical data to develop optimized classifying biosignatures for diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction.
resultsAutoML identified 3 BrCa-specific methylated promoters in CLDN15, MRGPRD and ZNF430. Pathway analysis revealed implications with biological processes such as signaling and transcription. Laboratory validation using clinical cfDNA samples confirmed elevated methylation levels in BrCa patients for all 3 promoters, which were correlated with poor prognostic and predictive parameters. Classification analysis by autoML of experimental methylation measurements and patients’ clinical data built 5 specific models: a diagnostic biosignature distinguishing BrCa from health (AUC 0.79, CI: 0.75–0.84), a classification biosignature differentiating BrCa disease status (adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic group) (AUC 0.68, CI: 0.62–0.72), a prognostic biosignature predicting relapse (AUC 0.79, CI: 0.74–0.83), a biosignature predicting treatment response in metastatic patients (AUC 0.86, CI: 0.67–1.00), and a biosignature differentiating distinct molecular subtypes (AUC of 0.71, CI: 0.64–0.77), underscoring their possible clinical utility.
conclusionOur data-driven approach successfully identified 3 BrCa-specifically methylated promoters in genes not previously implicated in BrCa. Their role in pathology needs further attention as they could also represent novel targets. Moreover, the laboratory validation in clinical BrCa cfDNA samples led to the development of 5 biosignatures, some demonstrating strong predictive performance. The low number of features and the minimally invasive nature of liquid biopsy highlight the potential for clinical implementation of great value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.