ArticleScientific reports2026
Adaptive motion planning for legged robots in unstructured terrain using deep reinforcement learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Legged robots are ideal for navigating unstructured terrain. Unlike wheeled robot platforms, legged robots maintain mobility over rocks, slopes, and uneven surfaces. However, motion planning in such environments remains challenging. The robot must handle unstable ground, limited sensing, and complex body dynamics. Classical control methods often fail to adapt when terrain and friction change unexpectedly. This paper presents an adaptive locomotion framework for quadrupedal robots. The controller is trained entirely in simulation using deep reinforcement learning (DRL). The DRL is trained using proximal policy optimization (PPO) method. During training, the robot observes joint states, body attitude, and local terrain height information. Training follows a curriculum mechanism. The robot starts on flat terrain. The difficulty gradually increases with slopes, height noise, rough surfaces, and friction variation. The reward function encourages forward progress, stability, low foot slip, and energy-efficient motion. Training occurs in Webots with wide domain randomization ranges. Policies learn to select footholds, regulate body attitude, and minimize slip without explicit terrain labels or gait scripts. Several behaviors emerge through learning. These include wider stance on slopes, increased step height on rocks, and hip abduction for balance recovery. To ensure robustness, we apply a multi-step validation process. These include cross-simulator evaluation, domain randomization Monte Carlo tests, physics consistency tests and adversarial disturbances. The controller achieves 94.6% success in Webots and 91.2% in PyBullet without retraining. It recovers from external pushes within 1.6 seconds. Results confirm that the proposed method learns stable, energy-efficient walking with minimal foot slippage across friction coefficients [Formula: see text]. This capability supports deployment in search-and-rescue, off-road mobility, and exploration tasks in unknown terrain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.