ArticleScientific reports2026
Interpretable deep learning reveals distinct spectral and temporal drivers of perceived musical emotion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study addresses a fundamental question in music psychology: which specific, dynamic acoustic features predict human listeners' emotional responses along the dimensions of valence and arousal. Our primary objective was to develop and validate an interpretable computational model that can serve as a tool for testing and advancing theories of music cognition. Using the publicly available DEAM dataset, containing 1,802 music excerpts with continuous valence-arousal ratings, we developed a novel, theory-guided neural network. This proposed model integrates a convolutional pathway for local spectral analysis with a Transformer pathway for capturing long-range temporal dependencies. Critically, its learning process is constrained by established principles from music psychology to enhance its plausibility. A core finding from an analysis of the model's attention mechanisms was that distinct acoustic patterns drive the two emotional dimensions: rhythmic regularity and spectral flux emerged as strong predictors of arousal, whereas harmonic complexity and musical mode were key predictors of valence. To validate our analytical tool, we confirmed that the model significantly outperformed standard baselines in predictive accuracy, achieving a Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) of 0.67 for valence and 0.73 for arousal. Furthermore, an ablation study demonstrated that the theory-guided constraints were essential for this superior performance. Together, these findings provide robust computational evidence for the distinct roles of temporal and spectral features in shaping emotional perception. This work demonstrates the utility of interpretable machine learning as a powerful methodology for testing and refining psychological theories of music and emotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.