Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491206›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A multi-task deep learning pipeline for classification, detection, and weakly supervised 3D segmentation of intraparenchymal hematoma on brain CT.

Cheng-En Juan, Hikam Muzakky, Chia-Ching Chang, Pen-Lin Chou, Ya-Hui Li, Tung-Yang Lee, Cheng-Hsuan Juan, Ming-Ting Tsai, Chun-Wen Chen, Chun-Jung Juan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Cheng-En JuanPost Graduate Year, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hikam MuzakkyDepartment of Medical Imaging, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chia-Ching ChangDepartment of Medical Imaging, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Pen-Lin ChouDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ya-Hui LiDepartment of Medical Imaging, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Tung-Yang LeeMaster's Program of Biomedical Informatics and Biomedical Engineering, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Cheng-Hsuan JuanGraduate Institute of Biomedical Electronics and Bioinformatics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Ting Tsai *Department of Medical Imaging, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan. nebulaforest@gmail.com.
Chun-Wen Chen *Department of Radiology, Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. mascara.tw@gmail.com.
Chun-Jung Juan *Department of Medical Imaging, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan. peterjuancj@gmail.com.

Funding

China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital CMUHCH-DMR-112-022China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital CMUHCH-DMR-112-027China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital CMUHCH-DMR-113-018Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 112- 2314-B-039-059-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study developed a multi-task deep learning pipeline for the automated assessment of acute intracranial hemorrhage and perihematomal edema on non-contrast brain computed tomography. Acute hemorrhage remains a major neurological emergency, and rapid and reliable image interpretation is essential for timely management. To address this clinical need, the proposed framework combined three complementary tasks in a single workflow: classification to identify the presence and subtype of hemorrhage, detection of perihematomal edema, and three-dimensional segmentation of intraparenchymal hematoma (IPH) using a weakly supervised strategy with pseudo-labels derived from edema masks. A total of 10,922 images were analyzed: 6,000 RSNA images, 728 PHE-SICH-CT-IDS slices from 120 patients, and 4,194 BHSD images. These models achieved high sensitivity (0.9584 ± 0.0068) for hemorrhage detection, robust performance (AUC, 0.9330 ± 0.0072) in differentiating subtypes, and reliable identification of edema (detection rate, 0.9873). Segmentation accuracy was excellent for IPH (Dice Similarity Coefficient [DSC], 0.9803 ± 0.0069) and moderate for edema (0.4569 ± 0.1809), with external validation confirming generalizability across centers (0.7549 ± 0.1143) for IPH. By integrating classification, detection, and segmentation, this pipeline demonstrates the potential of deep learning to provide accurate and scalable support for clinical decision-making, enhance diagnostic confidence, and streamline clinical workflow in the acute care setting.

Indexed as

BrainDeep LearningHematomaImaging, Three-DimensionalIntracranial HemorrhagesTomography, X-Ray ComputedBrain EdemaFemaleHumansMale3D segmentationArtificial intelligenceComputed tomographyDeep learningImage classificationIntracranial hemorrhageIntraparenchymal hematomaMedical image analysisPerihematomal edema

Identifiers

PMID41491206
PMCPMC12868777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.