ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2026
Reinvigorating CD8
Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting β-Adrenergic Signaling in Colorectal Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential of β-Blockers.Cancers · 2026Review
- Copper homeostasis and cuproptosis rewire the tumor microenvironment: mechanisms, immune modulation, and therapeutic opportunities.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- CD44-Targeting Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles (HAP) Induce Mitochondrial Dysfunction-Driven PANoptosis and Immunogenic Cell Death (ICD) via Ca Overload in Colorectal Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Targeting the Neuro-Immune Axis in Next-Generation Oncology: Discovery and Validation of βOncology research · 2026Review
- Roles of cuproptosis in central nervous system tumors: from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently, colorectal cancer ranks third in terms of global cancer incidence and second in terms of cancer-related mortality, posing a significant therapeutic challenge. However, the efficacy of immunotherapy is limited by the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, which is driven in part by T cell exhaustion. Herein, a copper-propranolol nanoplatform (Cu-PN NPs) rationally engineered by coordinating copper ions with propranolol and stabilizing the complex via mPEG-SH self-assembly was initially constructed. This design enables the codelivery of copper ions and propranolol, achieving dual functions: inducing copper-dependent cell death (cuproptosis) and apoptosis to trigger immunogenic cell death (ICD), and blocking ADRB1 on T cells to reverse exhaustion and restore effector function. In vitro studies in CT26 colorectal cancer (CRC) cells and patient-derived organoids (PDOs) confirmed enhanced cytotoxicity and ICD induction compared with those of monotherapy. In vivo, Cu-PN NPs significantly inhibited CRC tumour growth, reshaped the tumour microenvironment (TME) by attenuating T cell exhaustion, increasing cytokine secretion, and promoting dendritic cell maturation and CD8⁺ T cell activation. When combined with anti-PD-1 therapy, Cu-PN NPs markedly improved tumour control. This work introduces Cu-PN NPs as a dual-functional nanoplatform that integrates ICD induction with T cell reinvigoration via ADRB1 blockade, offering a promising strategy to enhance immune checkpoint blockade therapy against colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.