ArticleScientific reports2026
Air quality index AQI classification based on hybrid particle swarm and grey wolf optimization with ensemble machine learning model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mixed Forecast of Air Quality Index with a Bibranch Parallel Architecture Considering Seasonal Heterogeneity.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hybrid deep learning model for air quality prediction and its impact on healthcare.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate Air Quality Index (AQI) classification is essential for environmental surveillance and public health decision-making. Using a publicly available daily U.S. county-level dataset with six AQI categories (Good, Moderate, Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups, Unhealthy, Very Unhealthy, Hazardous), we conducted a comprehensive benchmarking study. Data preprocessing included missing-value imputation and class balancing via Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). We trained and evaluated classical and deep models (Random Forest (RF), Extra Trees (ET), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), and a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)) and assessed performance using cross-validation accuracy, test accuracy, macro-averaged recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. Ensemble methods (RF, ET) and the MLP consistently outperformed traditional baselines. RF achieved 99.3% test accuracy with perfect recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC; MLP achieved 99.0% test accuracy. A stacking ensemble, optimized with a hybrid Particle Swarm–Grey Wolf Optimizer (PSO–GWO), delivered 99.99% test accuracy, 99.99% macro-averaged recall, and 1.0000 ROC-AUC. These findings demonstrate that combining ensemble learning with metaheuristic optimization can substantially enhance multi-class AQI classification performance and offer a practical path toward reliable, real-time air-quality assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.