ArticleBMC medical education2026
Reframing learning interactions: transforming professional identity among students of traditional Korean medicine.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding the construction of professional identities is a key challenge in medical education. Advancing a global understanding of medical professionalism requires the recognition of the general principles and sociocultural particularities that shape professional identities across diverse medical traditions. We investigated how students of traditional Korean medicine develop a professional identity through transformative learning within a specific sociocultural context. The research questions are as follows: (1) How does the professional identity of students of traditional Korean medicine develop? (2) In the context of professional identity formation, how do students of traditional Korean medicine construct meaning from their cognitive (content dimension of learning), affective (incentive dimension of learning), and social (interaction dimension of learning) learning experiences?
methodsWe applied grounded theory to explore how students of traditional Korean medicine construct professional identities through various learning experiences. Twenty-one fourth-year students of traditional Korean medicine participated in in-depth interviews, followed by initial, focused, and theoretical coding.
resultsIn the incentive dimension, students of traditional Korean medicine experienced resistance, adaptation, dissatisfaction resolution, anxiety, conflict, or reproduction. In the content dimension, they developed expertise through a formal curriculum based on unfamiliar East Asian philosophy that included classical texts and Chinese characters. Clinical practice and volunteer work helped them deepen their understanding of traditional Korean medicine and build confidence. In the interaction dimension, they encountered a closed and individualistic school culture, had patient interactions through volunteering, interacted with role models, and confronted negative perceptions of doctors of traditional Korean medicine in online communities. The most significant finding was that the interaction dimension was divided into internal and external interactions based on learners' interpretations and meaning-making perspectives. The findings show that professional identity can only be fully formed when both types of interactions are experienced.
conclusionsThe insights gained from traditional Korean medical education have valuable implications for global medical education. By revealing the general principles and culturally specific dynamics of professional identity formation, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of how identity is shaped within pluralistic medical education environments, in which diverse medical paradigms, learning experiences, and cultural values intersect.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.