Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491152›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Grounding verbs in action: The facilitative effect of potential physical interactions with verbs.

Devin Dickinson, Mark Yates

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Devin DickinsonPsychology Department, University of South Alabama, 75 S. University Blvd., Mobile, AL, 36688, USA.
Mark YatesPsychology Department, University of South Alabama, 75 S. University Blvd., Mobile, AL, 36688, USA. myates@southalabama.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grounded cognition holds that a word's semantic representation is grounded in sensory-motor experiences. Much research has supported this account in relation to nouns, but less is known about verbs. The current research was designed to test the effect of grounded cognition with relation to action verbs. Accordingly, we developed a measure labeled potential physical interactions (PPI) aimed at capturing grounded content by measuring the number of physical objects an action verb can interact with. We first collected PPI ratings from 177 university students. Following this, a different group of 40 university students made lexical decisions to the words. The results indicate that words higher in PPI are responded to more rapidly than are those lower in PPI. We replicated this finding with data from the English Lexicon Project. The findings support the claim that the semantic representation of action verbs is grounded in sensory-motor experience.

Indexed as

PsycholinguisticsSemanticsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEmbodied cognitionSemanticsWord recognition

Identifiers

PMID41491152
PMCPMC12769990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.