ArticleApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2026
"The More You Give the Wearable, the More It Gives You": How Regular Exercisers Navigate Exercise Using Wearable Devices.
Article in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increased use of consumer off-the-shelf wearables (COTSW) for exercise training and self-monitoring has resulted in some COTSW offering individual 'recovery' or 'readiness' scores. These scores are derived using heart rate variability (HRV) and are designed to be easily interpreted (percent score; color codes) to assist users in optimizing their training. Limited research exists on the perceived informational utility associated with HRV-derived scores, which can impact user adoption and fidelity. The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand individuals' experiences using and interacting with their COTSW and readiness/recovery scores. Seventeen regular exercisers who owned and used a Whoop™ band or Oura™ ring for at least 3 months participated in a one-on-one virtual semi-structured interview. Interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, with themes supported by 'in-vivo' quotes. This paper focuses on three key themes for a comprehensive demonstration. Theme 1, 'It's kinda validating, right?' (Detroit) highlights how users found validation and reinforcement in their lifestyle choices and feelings about their well-being. Theme 2, 'It's really putting the power in my hands,' (Misty) indicates users' curiosity and experimentation with their devices, leading to behavioral adjustments aimed at improving their readiness/recovery scores. Theme 3, potential for 'more of an emotional response rather than a rational one, (Brian) demonstrates the complex reactive responses users may have towards these scores and each wearable's interface. These findings contribute to the understanding of how COTSW estimates of readiness or recovery impact users' behavior and self-perception, while highlighting the potential need for user education and design considerations to promote positive interactions with such data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491141What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.