ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Semi-automated end-to-end quality control system for annotation data based on automated Cobb angle measurement.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Reproducible COCO-Polygon Quality-Control Pipeline Improves Segmentation Stability in Endoscopic Airway Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe field of automated scoliosis diagnosis necessitates large-scale data annotation; however, existing annotation practices are hampered by the lack of a systematic, end-to-end quality control framework. To address this gap, we aim to develop a Semi-Automated End-to-End QC (SAE-QC) System designed to ensure annotation accuracy while substantially accelerating the data collection pipeline and reducing operational costs. This system is expected to provide critical support for the construction of high-quality datasets and the development of reliable AI models in the domain of automated Cobb angle measurement.
methodsWe propose the SAE-QC System for medical image annotation, featuring core modules including a data assignment module with dual-blind annotation pairing medical and non-medical annotators, an annotation protocol QC module enforcing standardized guidelines through structured validation, and an annotation QC module performing comprehensive quality checks from format validation to multi-annotator consistency analysis. The system’s modular architecture ensures cross-platform compatibility and seamless integration across the entire annotation workflow from data distribution to expert adjudication, while maintaining flexibility for different medical imaging tasks and data formats.
resultsWe developed the SAE-QC System, comprising a Data Assignment Module, an Annotation Protocol QC Module, and an Annotation QC Module. By integrating automated algorithms with expert supervision, the system enables end-to-end management of both Cobb angle measurement and vertebral segmentation, significantly reducing error rates and improving data reliability. When applied to a dataset construction task, experimental results showed the following improvements in annotation quality: the abnormality rate for Cobb angle measurement decreased from 66% to 19%, measurement consistency improved by approximately 40%, and the abnormality rate for vertebral segmentation decreased from 27% to 2.9%, with a significant increase in overall accuracy.
conclusionThis study demonstrates that the SAE-QC system—integrating automated quality assurance with expert supervision—effectively enhances the reliability of medical image annotation, providing a practical framework for non-specialist teams to achieve high-quality annotations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491131What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.