Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491127›Full record

SynthesisLasers in medical science2026

Accuracy of AI-based raman spectroscopy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Anis Halimi, Ahmed Msherghi, Mohamedhen Vall Nounou, Eman Abdulwahed, Hala Shlibek, Sara Bin Ateeqa, Ahmed Benali, Islam Khasawneh, Khadidja Kouidri, Muhammed Elhadi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Gastric Mucosa Cancer Risk: The Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment Staging System.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anis HalimiBadji Mokhtar University, Annaba, Algeria.
Ahmed MsherghiThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mohamedhen Vall NounouUniversity of Nouakchott Al Aasriya, Nouakchott, Mauritania.
Eman AbdulwahedUniversity of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya.
Hala ShlibekUniversity of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya.
Sara Bin AteeqaBenghazi Children's Hospital, Benghazi, Libya.
Ahmed BenaliFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Oujda, Oujda, Morocco.
Islam KhasawnehJordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
Khadidja KouidriAdrar Cancer Hospital, Adrar, Algeria.
Muhammed ElhadiKorea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. muhammed-elhadi@korea.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a significant global health challenge with high mortality rates, often due to late-stage diagnosis. We hypothesize that Raman spectroscopy (RS) (a modern minimally invasive technique that uses light to analyze the molecular composition of tissue, generating a unique "fingerprint" that reveals biochemical details, distinguishing between normal and diseased tissues.) when combined with Machine learning (ML) would provide accurate and expedite approach of detecting GC. We aim to meta-analyze the diagnostic accuracy of ML-enhanced RS in differentiating GC component from normal tissue. This study was conducted following PRISMA-DTA guidelines. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, VHL, and Google Scholar up to the end of February 2025. with an updated search conducted on 14 July 2025. We included any peer-reviewed manuscript that assessed ML-based RS technique for detecting GC components against normal control during endoscopy and reported sufficient data to construct 2 × 2 contingency table for assessing basic diagnostic metrics such as the sensitivity and specificity were included. Methodological quality of studies deemed eligible was assessed using QUADAS-2 risk of bias tool. Data on true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives were extracted to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) using R software. Heterogeneity was assessed with I

Indexed as

Machine LearningSpectrum Analysis, RamanStomach NeoplasmsHumansSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceGastric cancerMachine learningMeta-analysisRaman spectroscopySystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.