ArticleScientific reports2026
Biological and prognostic relevance of A-to-I RNA editing across consensus molecular subtypes of colon cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide and represents a major challenge for public health. Despite advances in molecular profiling, important gaps remain in our understanding of tumorigenesis and the regulatory mechanisms underlying CRC progression. The most widely adopted classification system is the Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS), which stratifies CRC into four biologically distinct subtypes. We investigated the role of A-to-I RNA editing across CMS subtypes in a cohort of 100 CRC patients at various disease stages. Bulk RNA-seq data were analyzed using REDItools to detect editing events, focusing on both recoding sites and edits within repetitive elements, such as Alu sequences. Furthermore, expression levels of the ADAR enzyme family were assessed, and deconvolution analyses were performed on single-cell RNA-seq data from an independent cohort of stage II CRC patients to characterize editing activity within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) networks, specific to each CMS subtype, were constructed based on editing events in repetitive elements. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was applied to evaluate associations with overall survival (OS). We observed statistically significant differences in ADARB1 expression across CMS subtypes. Single-cell RNA-seq data revealed subtype-specific distribution patterns of ADAR enzymes within the TME. Analysis of editing events showed subtype-specific signatures in both known cancer-related genes (e.g., COPA, CADPS, IGFBP7) and novel candidates (ZNF552, RALGPS1). Editing in repetitive elements informed the construction of distinct ceRNA networks for each CMS subtype, suggesting different post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms. Survival analysis identified three variables significantly associated with OS, independent of CMS classification and clinical stage: ADARB1 expression, and editing events in NOP14-AS1 (chr4:2960236; p = 0.036; HR = 0.0069), previously linked to 5-FU sensitivity, and ST7-AS2 (chr4:117120557). This study underscores the biological relevance of RNA editing in CRC, highlighting its impact on chemoresistance, the tumor microenvironment, and subtype-specific gene regulation. Our findings suggest that RNA editing represents a critical post-transcriptional regulatory layer in CRC and holds potential as a biomarker and therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.