ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
The relation matters: Visual working memory-guided attention can be modulated by causality between memory items.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Working memory and attention play pivotal roles in navigating the external environment and constructing our understanding of the world. Extensive research has demonstrated that items stored in visual working memory (VWM) can capture attention during visual search tasks, a phenomenon known as VWM-guided attention. However, a debate remains regarding the number of items that can guide attention. While early findings support a single-template limitation, more recent studies suggest that multiple items may guide attention when perceptually grouped. Yet this work has largely focused on static stimuli. In contrast, dynamic, temporally unfolding interactions, which are more representative of real-world perception, remain underexplored. Although previous research has shown that a single motion cue can capture attention, it remains unclear whether two separate motions, when bound by a meaningful dynamic relation, can function as a unified attentional template. In this study, we examine whether causality, a spontaneously perceived and ecologically valid dynamic relation, can restructure memory representations to modulate attention. We manipulated the presence of phenomenal causality using variations in time intervals, motion paths, and motion order. The results revealed that when causality existed between two memory items, singleton distractors matching either of the memory items could guide attention in visual search tasks, whereas this effect disappeared in the absence of phenomenal causality. These findings suggest that causality can indeed modulate VWM-guided attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491060What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.