Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491026›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2026

Neural Signatures of Engagement and Event Segmentation during Story Listening in Background Noise.

Björn Herrmann, Aysha Motala, Ryan A Panela, Ingrid S Johnsrude

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Björn HerrmannRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Academy for Research and Education, North York, Ontario M6A 2E1, Canada bherrmann@research.baycrest.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6362-3043
Aysha MotalaDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.
Ryan A PanelaRotman Research Institute, Baycrest Academy for Research and Education, North York, Ontario M6A 2E1, Canada.
Ingrid S JohnsrudeDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7810-1333

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech in everyday life is often masked by background noise, making comprehension effortful. Characterizing brain activity patterns when individuals listen to masked speech can help clarify the mechanisms underlying such effort. In the current study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in humans of either sex to investigate how neural signatures of story listening change in the presence of masking noise. We show that, as speech masking increases, spatial and temporal activation patterns in auditory regions become more idiosyncratic to each listener. In contrast, spatial activity patterns in brain networks linked to effort (e.g., cingulo-opercular network) are more similar across listeners when speech is highly masked and less intelligible, suggesting shared neural processes. Moreover, at times during stories when one meaningful event ended and another began, neural activation increased in frontal, parietal, and medial cortices. This event-boundary response appeared little affected by background noise, suggesting that listeners process meaningful units and, in turn, the gist of naturalistic, continuous speech even when it is masked somewhat by background noise. The current data may indicate that people stay engaged and cognitive processes associated with naturalistic speech processing remain intact under moderate levels of noise, whereas auditory processing becomes more idiosyncratic to each listener.

Indexed as

BrainNoisePerceptual MaskingSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultevent segmentationfunctional magnetic resonance imagingintersubject correlationlistening effortnaturalistic speech processingspeech masking

Identifiers

PMID41491026
PMCPMC12803707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.