ArticleScientific reports2026
Effect of the health action process approach theory in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A study of the profiles of perceived inadequate qualifications and associated factors among nursing interns: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rehabilitation training after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is crucial for restoring joint function. This quasi-experimental enrolled 82 orthopedic patients from a Grade A tertiary hospital in Yunnan Province, who were divided into a control group (41 cases) and an experimental group (41 cases). Both groups received routine nursing care, while the experimental group additionally received a 3-month rehabilitation program based on the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) theory combined with the best evidence for TKA rehabilitation. Preoperative indicators showed no significant difference in preoperative indicators between the two groups. Postoperatively, the experimental group demonstrated higher Hospital of Special Surgery (HSS) scores and Self-Efficacy for Rehabilitation Outcome Scale (SER) scores (P-adjusted = 0.020;P-adjusted = 0.006), as well as lower Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (P-adjusted = 0.009, P-adjusted = 0.016). The research found that a rehabilitation program based on the HAPA theory is both scientific and effective, which can significantly relieve pain, improve joint function, and enhance patients' self-efficacy in rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.