ArticleScientific reports2026
Isolation and characterization of heavy metal tolerant microalgae from old mining areas of Saxony.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A framework for microalgal biosorption of heavy metals: mechanisms, modeling, and critical insights.RSC advances · 2026Review
- An Overview of Bioproducts from Wastewater-Grown Microalgae: Recent Advancements, Economic and Feasibility Concerns.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Bioremediation of heavy metal contamination: recent developments and future directions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heavy metal contamination poses a major threat to ecosystems and human health, particularly in mining-impacted areas. Algal biosorption offers a promising, low-cost, and sustainable approach to mitigate this problem. In this study, five microalgal strains were bioprospected and isolated from abandoned mining sites and evaluated for their tolerance and ability to remove Cu, Cd, and Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. Laboratory experiments were performed to assess heavy metal tolerance and biosorption efficiency under controlled conditions. The results demonstrated that isolates Chlorella vulgaris RG1-4 and Tetradesmus obliquus Ehr33-9 exhibited the highest tolerance and biosorption capacity for Cu, with removal efficiencies of 100.00 mg/g and 89.73 mg/g, respectively. The isolate Lobochlamys segnis Ehr31-1 showed the highest tolerance and biosorption capacity for Cd, reaching 93.17 mg/g. These findings highlight the potential of locally adapted microalgal strains as effective biosorbents for remediating heavy metal-contaminated water sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.