Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491004›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Insights into motor control: predict muscle activity from upper limb kinematics with LSTM networks.

Marie D Schmidt, Tobias Glasmachers, Ioannis Iossifidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marie D SchmidtInstitute of Computer Science, Ruhr West University of Applied Sciences, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany. marie.schmidt@hs-ruhrwest.de.
Tobias GlasmachersInstitute for Neural Computation, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Ioannis IossifidisInstitute of Computer Science, Ruhr West University of Applied Sciences, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between upper limb kinematics and corresponding muscle activity, aiming to understand how predictive models can approximate motor control. We employ a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network trained on kinematic end effector data to estimate muscle activity for eight muscles. The model exhibits strong predictive accuracy for new repetitions of known movements and generalizes to unseen movements, suggesting it captures underlying biomechanical principles rather than merely memorizing patterns. This generalization is particularly valuable for applications in rehabilitation and human-machine interaction, as it reduces the need for exhaustive datasets. To further investigate movement representation and learning, we analyze the impact of motion segmentation, hypothesizing that breaking movements into simpler components may improve model performance. Additionally, we explore the role of the swivel angle in reducing redundancy in arm kinematics. Another key focus is the effect of training data complexity on generalization. Specifically, we assess whether training on a diverse set of movements leads to better performance than specializing in either simple, single-joint movements or complex, multi-joint movements. The study is based on an experimental setup involving 23 distinct upper limb movements performed by five subjects. Our findings provide insights into the interplay between kinematics and muscle activity, contributing to motor control research and advancing neural network-based movement prediction.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalNeural Networks, ComputerUpper ExtremityAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansMaleMovementYoung AdultArtificial generated signalElectromyography (EMG)Generative modelInertial measurement unit (IMU)Motion parametersMotor controlMuscle activityNeural networksSwivel angleVoluntary movement

Identifiers

PMID41491004
PMCPMC12820307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.