ArticleScientific reports2026
Monitoring and assessment of potentially hazardous particles in high-risk workplaces in the production of Ni-Cd batteries.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The manufacture of Ni-Cd batteries involves the risk of contact with and inhalation of dust particles containing heavy metals, including potential carcinogens. Three workplaces were selected that appeared to pose the greatest risk to workers in terms of exposure to heavy metal (nickel and cadmium) dust generated during the production and handling of nickel-cadmium plates. Although the limits for dust and carcinogens and mutagens are very strict, they are gradually being tightened. Therefore, the main motivation was to find the source of the highest amounts of respirable particles, determine the size of the particles, the composition of the fraction and evaluated potential toxicity of particles captured on the filters. This will help to propose additional measures to minimise concentrations of potentially carcinogenic particles in the working environment. The chemical analysis, particle size distribution, metal content and cytotoxicity of the particles trapped on the filters were investigated. While the concentration of heavy metals was well below the permissible exposure limits, the extracts obtained from the sampled filters had a significant effect on cytotoxicity, particularly those containing lower concentrations of particles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.