Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41490999›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Optimizing soil cover systems for coal gangue reclamation: balancing leachate control, environmental risk, and cost.

Xihui Liu, Zhenqi Hu, Jingwei Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xihui LiuSchool of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing, 100083, People's Republic of China.
Zhenqi HuSchool of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, People's Republic of China. huzq@mail.neu.edu.cn.
Jingwei GaoSchool of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The large-scale accumulation of coal gangue not only occupies land resources but also poses serious environmental risks, while offering opportunities for resource recovery through mine land reclamation. This study investigates how soil cover thickness regulates rainfall infiltration in coal gangue backfill systems through laboratory testing of hydraulic parameters, field infiltration monitoring, and HYDRUS-based numerical simulations. Results show that a 50 cm soil interlayer effectively delays infiltration and reduces moisture at the soil–gangue interface by approximately 40%, achieving a balance between hydraulic barrier performance and cost efficiency. Increasing the soil cover thickness to 70–100 cm further improves water retention capacity but results in reduced economic benefits. For long-term rainfall conditions, a layered configuration consisting of alternating coal gangue and soil layers, capped with a 1 m surface layer, moderated moisture transfer and limited deep percolation, maintaining stable hydrological behavior throughout the simulation period. Multi-objective optimization using the NSGA-II algorithm identified a total cover thickness of 50–60 cm as the optimal configuration, reducing leachate generation by about 90%, controlling heavy-metal migration risk below 3%, and maintaining unit costs within 120–150 CNY m−2. These findings provide a quantitative and practical basis for designing sustainable soil cover systems that integrate solid waste utilization with environmental protection across different climatic regions.

Indexed as

Coal gangue backfill reclamationLeachate reductionNSGA-II optimizationRainfall infiltration modelingSoil cover thickness

Identifiers

PMID41490999
PMCPMC12820258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.