ArticleScientific reports2026
A machine learning study highlighting the challenges of fidgety movement recognition using vision and inertial sensors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Past medical research has shown that infantile movement and early neurological development are closely linked. Fidgety Movements that are reflex-like movement occurring in healthy infants less than 20-week of age have proven to be especially important, as past studies have highlighted that their absence is strongly correlated with the future development of neurological disorders like Cerebral Palsy. To provide a timely intervention, the General Movement Assessment was proposed as a screening medical procedure carried out by clinical personnel specifically trained to recognize Fidgety Movements. Because of its high cost in time and resources, several initiatives to automatize General Movement Assessment using machine learning techniques have been proposed in the literature. However none has managed to emerge as state-of-the-art so far. To investigate this problem, we conducted a study using deep learning approaches to learn disentangled feature representations for the recognition of Fidgety Movements using RGB-D video and Inertial Measurement Unit data acquired from 95 infants (average age: [Formula: see text] weeks). Our results show that while it is possible to learn features that characterize movement independently of subject information, obtaining feature representations that consistently generalize to subjects unseen during training remains challenging. More specifically, we observe that both the vision- and sensor-based modalities have specific challenges to be addressed for the recognition of Fidgety Movements. We discuss them and provide recommendations to help researchers interested in investigating this problem in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.