Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41490887›Full record

ReviewZhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences2026

[Application and progress of artificial intelligence agents in drug development].

Donghai Zhao, Changyu Hsieh

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Donghai ZhaoSchool of Pharmacy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. 22319109@zju.edu.cn.
Changyu HsiehSchool of Pharmacy, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. kimhsieh@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug discovery faces formidable challenges including high technology, high costs, substantial risks, and prolonged development timelines, necessitating disruptive technologies capable of systematically improving efficiency, enhancing predictive accuracy, and reducing failure rates. Artificial intelligence (AI) agent-an emerging intelligent paradigm powered by large language models-holds significant potential to transform the entire drug development pipeline. Their core capability lies in performing autonomous reasoning, planning, and tool utilization directed at complex scientific objectives, thereby integrating and orchestrating multiple research stages and transitioning AI from a mere "tool" to an "active collaborator". Through knowledge integration and hypothesis generation, AI agents can identify underexplored therapeutic targets and novel mecha-nisms of action. In parallel, they can automate complex tasks such as molecular design, optimization, and synthesis planning, and further close the loop between virtual design and physical experimentation by interfacing with automated experimental platforms. Moreover, AI agents are evolving toward higher-level paradigms, including the development of integrated drug design platforms and general-purpose biomedical agents. This review systematically summarizes the core architectures of AI agents, highlights their applica-tions across key stages of drug development, and discusses current limitations along with future directions, providing a reference for researches in related fields.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug DesignDrug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryHumansArtificial intelligence agentDrug developmentLarge language modelMulti-agent systemReview

Identifiers

PMID41490887
PMCPMC12972872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.