Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41490857›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Functional Assessment for Surgery by a Timed Walk (FAST Walk) study: protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study of the 6 min walk test for preoperative risk stratification in major non-cardiac surgery.

Duminda N Wijeysundera, Nancy M Salbach, Matthew T V Chan, Shabbir M H Alibhai, Martine T E Puts, Angela Jerath, Rachel Khadaroo, Sahar Ehtesham, Janneth Pazmino-Canizares, Karim S Ladha and 16 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06412367 (FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT FOR SURGERY BY A TIMED WALK), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06412367 recruitingnot on this map

Functional assessment for surgery by a timed walk

TypeobservationalSponsorUnity Health TorontoRan2024 to 2029Enrolled1,672ConditionsSurgery-Complications, Postoperative Complications
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Duminda N WijeysunderaDepartment of Anesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada d.wijeysundera@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-8605
Nancy M SalbachDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6178-0691
Matthew T V ChanDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Shabbir M H AlibhaiDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Martine T E PutsLawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0710-1854
Angela JerathDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rachel KhadarooDepartment of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sahar EhteshamApplied Health Research Centre, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Janneth Pazmino-CanizaresDepartment of Anesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Karim S LadhaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John T GrantonDepartment of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leandra AmadoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Emmanuelle DuceppeDepartment of Medicine, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Emily HladkowiczAcute Care Research Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute CIR, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Susan M LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Royal Columbian Hospital, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9016-310X
Su-Yin MacdonellDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Matteo ParottoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1165-4264
Anahi PerlasDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pablo E SerranoDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mullein D ThorleifsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Janet M van VlymenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Judith van WaesDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Elizabeth RaczPatient and Family Partner Program, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Luke WilmhurstPatient and Family Partner Program, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel I McIsaacDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8543-1859
FAST Walk Study Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPoor cardiopulmonary fitness is an important risk factor for postoperative complications, yet a feasible, objective and prognostically accurate method to assess preoperative fitness has not been established. The 6 min walk test (6MWT) is a simple, inexpensive and widely applicable measure that shows promise for predicting postoperative risk. However, robust data are lacking on whether the 6MWT accurately predicts complications, provides incremental prognostic value beyond routinely collected clinical factors or outperforms simpler alternatives such as questionnaires, cardiac biomarkers or grip strength testing. The Functional Assessment for Surgery by a Timed Walk (FAST Walk) study is designed to address these knowledge gaps by evaluating whether the 6MWT improves prediction of key postoperative outcomes compared with clinical factors and simpler measures of fitness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The FAST Walk study is an international multicentre prospective cohort study of 1672 adults (≥40 years) undergoing major elective non-cardiac surgery at centres in Canada, Hong Kong, Australia, Spain and the Netherlands. Participants complete a preoperative 6MWT and baseline assessments of comorbidities, self-reported cardiopulmonary fitness (MET: Re-evaluation for Perioperative Cardiac Risk questionnaire), biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) and grip strength. The primary outcome is 30-day death or major postoperative complication, defined as Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher. Secondary outcomes are (1) death or new significant disability at 90 days after surgery and (2) days alive and out of hospital at 30 days after surgery. Disability is measured using the short-form WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 instrument. Multivariable regression models and complementary metrics of prediction performance will be used to determine whether 6MWT distance adds prognostic value beyond routinely collected clinical factors and simpler measures of fitness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The FAST Walk study has received research ethics board approval at all participating sites. Recruitment commenced in June 2024, with completion of participant follow-up expected in 2026. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations, with the primary results anticipated in 2027. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06412367.

Indexed as

Elective Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CareWalk TestCardiorespiratory FitnessFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as TopicPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentAdult anaesthesiaExercise TestPhysical FitnessSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID41490857
PMCPMC12778347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.