ArticleJournal of menopausal medicine2025
Insights into Singaporean Physicians' Knowledge and Attitudes on Menopause Hormone Therapy.
Article in Journal of menopausal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate physicians' knowledge and attitudes in Singapore regarding menopause hormonal therapy (MHT).
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 186 physicians practicing in Singapore, including 113 in Family Medicine and 73 in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (O&G). Knowledge was assessed using 21 questions: five questions each on indications, contraindications and risks, and six clinical scenario questions. Attitudes were assessed using five questions: confidence in prescribing, beliefs about the necessity of MHT, whether they would recommend it for patients or family, and concerns about its safety profile. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Comparisons of knowledge and attitudes across demographic variables and specialties were performed using
resultsForty point three percent of physicians were unaware that MHT is used to prevent postmenopausal osteoporosis. Sixty-six point one percent and 30.6% of physicians, respectively, were unaware that patients on MHT are at a higher risk of gallbladder disease and stroke. Fifty-two point two percent would have chosen non-hormonal treatments for patients with premature ovarian insufficiency. Most physicians expressed a lack of confidence in prescribing MHT (74.2%), with a significant difference (
conclusionsInformation about MHT continues to evolve, emphasizing the importance of keeping physicians updated. Knowledge gaps vary among specialties. Improving physicians' knowledge by targeted educational interventions should help bolster confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.