ArticleJMIR mental health2026
Digital Humans for Depression Assessment and Intervention Support: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The growing global burden of mental health disorders has intensified the search for scalable, accessible, and cost-effective interventions. Conversational agents in the form of digital humans have emerged as promising tools to deliver mental health support across diverse populations and settings. Objective: This scoping review aimed to analyze the role of digital humans in depression management, identifying their specific applications in both diagnostic processes and therapeutic interventions. Additionally, it aimed to evaluate the design choices implemented in digital human systems, including their appearance, interaction modalities, back-end intelligence systems, and the various roles they assume. Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines, we systematically searched peer-reviewed literature across major databases, including ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Web of Science, and PubMed, to capture both psychological and technological perspectives. The search query included a wide variety of synonyms for digital humans and depression: ("avatar" OR "virtual agent" OR "embodied conversational agent" OR "relational agent" OR "digital human" OR "virtual human" OR "virtual character") AND ("Major Depressive Disorder" OR "Depression"). Studies were included if they described the development, implementation, or evaluation of digital humans designed to support mental health outcomes. Data were charted on agent design, therapeutic approach, target population, delivery context, and reported effectiveness. Results: In total, 20 studies (2010-2024) were included. Depression assessment studies comprised 35% (n=7), interventions 55% (n=11), and combined approaches 10% (n=2). Assessment protocols included the questionnaires Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Very Short Visual Analog Scale of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Visual Analog Scale - Very Short version, semistructured interviews based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria, and interactive tasks designed to elicit emotional responses. Intervention approaches used cognitive behavioral therapy, psychoeducation, compassion-focused therapy, and avatar therapy. Digital humans assumed 5 distinct roles: interviewer (n=6), facilitator (n=3), counselor (n=3), educator (n=3), and actor (n=5). Interviewers primarily appeared in assessment studies, presenting structured questions. Counselors engaged in therapeutic dialogues, while educators delivered psychoeducational content. Facilitators assisted participants in achieving system goals. Actors portrayed specific emotions or dysfunctional beliefs to facilitate therapeutic processes. Studies highlighted digital humans' utility in enhancing diagnostic processes and therapeutic interventions, noting the potential for transformation through physiological data integration. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that digital humans represent a transformative advancement in depression management, offering innovative applications across both assessment and intervention phases. The evidence reveals digital humans' effectiveness in replicating traditional therapeutic roles while providing unique advantages, including 24/7 accessibility, reduced stigma, consistent care delivery, and personalized support. Digital humans can successfully function to establish therapeutic alliances and elicit meaningful engagement comparable with human providers. Findings underscore the need for continued research to fully realize digital humans' potential in addressing depression-specific needs, advocating for expansion into diverse therapeutic scenarios, and exploration of unexplored digital human applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.