ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Tailored Individual Follow-Ups Versus a One-Day Group Course in Patients With Long COVID (Post- COVID-19 Condition): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of tailored individual follow-up vs. standard one-day group course on health-related quality of life in patients with post COVID-19 condition: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The high prevalence of patients with post-COVID-19 condition, also called long COVID, even among those with mild initial disease, may have a large impact on both the individual and society. Disability in everyday life, reduced health-related quality of life and work capacity, strain on the health care system, and substantial socioeconomic costs are associated with long COVID. More research to investigate the effectiveness of rehabilitation services is warranted. Objective: This study aims to examine the effectiveness of tailored individual follow-ups versus a 1-day group course in patients with long COVID. Additionally, the feasibility and use of a mobile app for self-monitoring goal achievement will be assessed. Methods: This is a single-center, parallel-group, superiority randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. A total of 62 outpatients aged 18-65 years with long COVID will be randomized to either a rehabilitation program with individual follow-up consultations or a 1-day self-management group course. The individual intervention incorporates setting goals, teaching cognitive behavioral strategies, energy management (pacing), and a supervised gradual increase in both physical and cognitive activities tailored to individual tolerance levels. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in health-related quality of life, measured using the EQ-5D-5L index at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include improvements in symptoms, work participation, neurocognitive function, and app usability, assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months, depending on the outcome measure. Results: Data enrollment started in October 2023. A total of 62 participants were included by November 2024. Data collection is planned to be completed in November 2025. Conclusions: Long COVID poses substantial challenges for both individuals and society, underscoring the need for effective rehabilitation strategies. This study will provide valuable insights into the benefits of an individualized outpatient rehabilitation program. The results from this clinical trial will help guide future treatment recommendations and may improve long-term outcomes for affected patients. Additionally, the study will generate important knowledge about neuropsychological function and digital self-management tools in long COVID rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.