Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2026
Effect of AI-Based Natural Language Feedback on Engagement and Clinical Outcomes in Fully Self-Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: 3-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Treatment Benefit With Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Clinical Evaluation of an AI-Assisted Decision Support System for General Anesthesia Management Based on Data From 6 Centers: Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Assessing depression among the Japanese population: psychometric properties of the Japanese version of Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-self-reported version.BMC psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepression remains a major global cause of disability; yet, access to optimal mental health services is limited. Self-guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) offers a scalable alternative but is generally less effective than guided programs, showing limited antidepressant effects and incomplete symptomatic and functional recovery. Adherence remains a major barrier. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly natural language processing, enable automated advisory and empathic feedback that may enhance engagement and therapeutic impact. Although previous trials have reported promising effects, most used heterogeneous control conditions, making it difficult to isolate the specific contribution of AI within fully self-guided interventions.
objectiveThis randomized controlled trial evaluated whether natural language processing-based AI feedback integrated into a fully self-guided iCBT program improves clinical outcomes and engagement compared with an otherwise identical iCBT program without AI support.
methodsWe recruited 1187 adults aged 20-60 years online and randomly assigned them to AI-augmented iCBT (AI-iCBT; n=396), iCBT without AI (n=397), or a waitlist control (n=394). Both active groups received 6 weekly sessions combining video-based psychoeducation and cognitive restructuring exercises. The AI-iCBT program additionally provided automated empathic and advisory feedback. The primary outcome was depressive symptom severity (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) at week 7 and month 3, analyzed using mixed-effects models for repeated measures under an intention-to-treat framework. Secondary outcomes included a dichotomous PHQ-9 score of ≥10, Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Sheehan Disability Scale, and weekly participation rates. Exploratory analyses assessed the impact of AI functions on engagement and antidepressant effects in the efficacy analysis set (EAS).
resultsIn intention-to-treat analyses, no significant between-group differences were observed in mean PHQ-9 scores at week 7 or month 3, whereas engagement analyses showed a significant group × week interaction, with AI-iCBT participants demonstrating consistently higher odds of weekly participation (odds ratio 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.39; P<.001). Exploratory analyses indicated that activation of the empathic feedback function strongly predicted adherence (odds ratio 9.99, 95% CI 5.80-17.21; P<.001), while advisory feedback was not significant. In EAS analyses, iCBT showed significant short-term improvement versus control at postintervention, whereas at follow-up, only AI-iCBT showed a significantly lower proportion of participants with a PHQ-9 score of ≥10 compared with control (difference -0.15, 95% CI -0.30 to -0.01; P=.046). No serious adverse events were reported.
conclusionsAI support significantly improved adherence to a fully self-administered program. In EAS analyses, AI-iCBT also showed a significantly lower proportion of participants with PHQ-9 score of ≥10 at follow-up compared with control. Empathic feedback emerged as a key mechanism for sustaining engagement, suggesting that AI communication may help maintain participation in scalable digital mental health interventions. Further research is required.
trial registrationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) UMIN000019228; https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000022220.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.