ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Sex-allocation trade-offs and their genetic architecture revealed by experimental evolution.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex-allocation trade-offs and their genetic architecture revealed by experimental evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Dioecy in a wind-pollinated herb explained by disruptive selection on sex allocation via inbreeding avoidance.The New phytologist · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The theory of sex allocation is hailed as one of evolutionary biology's great successes. But while it has successfully predicted strategies of resource allocation to male versus female offspring under a wide range of conditions in species with separate sexes, it has been difficult to verify the fundamental assumption of a direct genetic trade-off between male and female allocations when both sexes are expressed together in the same individuals. This trade-off assumption supposes that mutations that increase an individual's male allocation reduce its female allocation, and vice versa. Here, we use experimental evolution to generate wide variation in sex allocation in a wind-pollinated annual plant. We demonstrate a clear trade-off between the two sexual functions over time, with populations repeatedly evolving increased male and correspondingly reduced female allocation. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis performed on multiple crosses further reveals the segregation of allelic variation at "trade-off loci." Taken together, our results demonstrate a genetic trade-off in sex allocation in hermaphrodites and provide compelling evidence for sex-allocation trade-off loci. Our study thus verifies the fundamental assumption of sex-allocation theory and secures its general applicability to both dioecious and hermaphroditic species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.