Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41490318›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Female moths incorporate plant acoustic emissions into their oviposition decision-making process.

Rya Seltzer, Guy Zer Eshel, Omer Yinon, Ahmed Afani, Ofri Eitan, Sabina Matveev, Galina Levedev, Michael Davidovitz, Tal Ben Tov, Gayl Sharabi and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Rya Seltzer *School of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3041-4648
Guy Zer Eshel *School of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6828-1290
Omer YinonSchool of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ahmed AfaniSchool of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ofri EitanSchool of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Sabina MatveevPlant Protection Institute, Agricultural Research Organization - Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZiyyon, Israel.
Galina LevedevPlant Protection Institute, Agricultural Research Organization - Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZiyyon, Israel.
Michael DavidovitzPlant Protection Institute, Agricultural Research Organization - Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZiyyon, Israel.
Tal Ben TovSchool of Plant Sciences and Food Security, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Gayl SharabiSchool of Plant Sciences and Food Security, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yuval ShapiraSchool of Plant Sciences and Food Security, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Neta ShvilSagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Maya Harari GibliSchool of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ireen AtallahSchool of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Sahar HadadSchool of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Dana MentPlant Protection Institute, Agricultural Research Organization - Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZiyyon, Israel.
Lilach Hadany *School of Plant Sciences and Food Security, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1642-5308
Yossi Yovel *School of Zoology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5429-9245

Funding

European Research Council 10.3030/101001993European Research Council 10.3030/101098318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects rely on plants' visual, chemical, tactile, and electrical cues when making various decisions. A recent study demonstrated that dehydrated plants emit ultrasonic sounds within the auditory sensitivity range of many moth species. In this study, we sought to determine whether insects also rely on plant acoustic signals when making decisions. We investigated whether female moths rely on ultrasonic clicks which are typically produced by dehydrated plants when deciding where to oviposit. In the absence of an actual plant, the moths indeed preferred to lay their eggs in proximity to acoustic signals which represent dehydrating plants. Tracking the moths' behavior prior to the decision showed that they examined both sides of the arena and gradually spent more time on the acoustic-playback side. Interestingly, when actual plants were added to the arena, the oviposition preference was reversed and the moths preferred silent plants, which is in accordance with their a priori preference for hydrated plants. Deafening the moths eliminated their preference, confirming that the choice was based on hearing. Moreover, the presence of male moths, including their auditory signals, did not affect their oviposition decision, suggesting that the response was specific to plant sound emissions. We reveal evidence for a first acoustic interaction between moths and plants, but as plants emit various sounds, our findings hint at the existence of more currently unknown insect-plant acoustic interactions.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMothsOvipositionSolanum lycopersicumUltrasonic WavesAnimal CommunicationAnimalsFemaleHost-Parasite InteractionsMaleecologyplant-insect interactionsplant ultrasonic clicksultrasound-hearing moths

Identifiers

PMID41490318
PMCPMC12768406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.