Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41490274›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2026

Numerical Integration of Slater Basis Functions Over Prolate Spheroidal Grids.

Alexander Stark, Nathan Meier, Jeffrey Hatch, Joshua A Kammeraad, Duy-Khoi Dang, Paul M Zimmerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander StarkDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6830-2713
Nathan MeierDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Jeffrey HatchDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Joshua A KammeraadDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Duy-Khoi DangDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Paul M ZimmermanDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7444-1314

Funding

Basic Energy SciencesNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy DE-SC0022241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slater basis functions have desirable properties that can improve electronic structure simulations, but improved numerical integration methods are needed. This work builds upon the SlaterGPU library for the evaluation of Hamiltonian matrix elements in the resolution-of-the-identity approximation. In particular, a prolate spheroidal grid will provide sufficient integral accuracy to employ larger basis sets (quadruple-zeta and greater) in practical computations involving polyatomics. To integrate 3-center Coulomb and nuclear attraction terms, an improved grid representation around the third center is introduced. The RMSEs of the integral quantities are evaluated and compared to the previous numerical integration method used in SlaterGPU (Becke partitioning), resulting in a ~3 order of magnitude reduction in the error for 2-center integral quantities. The procedure is generally applicable to polyatomic systems, GPU accelerated for high performance computing, and tested on self-consistent field and full configuration interaction wavefunctions. Results for a number of 3-atom models as well as propanediyl (C

Indexed as

electronic structureGPUnumerical integrationquantum chemistrySlater basis

Identifiers

PMID41490274
PMCPMC12768307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.