ArticlePloS one2026
Economic evaluation of biomarker-based surveillance for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Thai patients with Compensated Liver Cirrhosis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in Europe: challenges and lessons from global practice.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in Thailand. However, most Thai patients at high risk of HCC lack access to routine surveillance programs. This study used ultrasound- or biomarker-based screening approaches to assess the cost-utility analysis of routine HCC surveillance in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis (CLC).
methodThe model utilized a Markov-style microsimulation framework to simulate outcomes from alternative HCC surveillance methods for Thai patients. The model was designed to represent Thai patients and healthcare as accurately as possible, and novel Thai patient data was used to estimate treatment and survival associated with screening. Outcomes included diagnostic performance, total costs, and overall health expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was assessed according to the Thai willingness-to-pay threshold (฿160,000 = 4,800 USD).
resultsResults suggest that routine HCC surveillance is likely cost-effective in Thai patients with CLC. Among the biomarker-based approaches, GAAD score, which combined gender, age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and des-gamma carboxyprothrombin (DCP), was the most cost-effective due to its high detection of HCC while resulting in comparably few false positive diagnoses. Compared to no routine surveillance, GAAD surveillance is suggested to be cost-effective (ICER: $4,631). Compared to ultrasound plus AFP - the recommended standard of care - GAAD is suggested to be dominant, resulting in better overall health at a lower cost.
conclusionBi-annual routine HCC surveillance is suggested to be cost-effective for the Thai healthcare system when used for patients with CLC. Among biomarker-based approaches, GAAD appears to be the most cost-effective and could maximize the benefits of HCC surveillance in high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.