Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41490246›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2026

Sex-specific associations between surgery-induced weight loss and cancer outcomes: A post hoc analysis of the prospective, controlled Swedish Obese Subjects study.

Kajsa Sjöholm, Per-Arne Svensson, Johanna C Andersson-Assarsson, Peter Jacobson, Sofie Ahlin, Cecilia Karlsson, Björn Carlsson, Felipe M Kristensson, Per Karlsson, Markku Peltonen and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01479452 (Effects of Bariatric Surgery in Swedish Obese Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01479452 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Bariatric Surgery in Swedish Obese Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorGöteborg UniversityRan1987 to 2005Enrolled4,047ConditionsObesityArmsBariatric surgery, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kajsa SjöholmInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0146-8193
Per-Arne SvenssonInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johanna C Andersson-AssarssonInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9082-8589
Peter JacobsonInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sofie AhlinInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0619-2683
Cecilia KarlssonInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4299-8775
Björn CarlssonInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Felipe M KristenssonInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9328-4262
Per KarlssonDepartment of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Markku PeltonenFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Lena M S CarlssonInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Magdalena TaubeInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7944-9673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity increases cancer risk, whereas surgery-induced weight loss is associated with reduced risk. Risk-based patient stratification may be needed to better understand and maximize benefits of weight loss interventions in individuals with obesity. To this end, comprehensive data from high-quality studies with extended follow-up are imperative. This study examines the link between bariatric surgery and long-term cancer outcomes, focusing on patient subgroups defined by previously suggested predictors of treatment benefit, such as sex and baseline insulin levels. METHODS AND

findingsThis post-hoc analysis used data from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study, a prospective, controlled intervention trial, designed to investigate the long-term effects of bariatric surgery-induced weight loss (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01479452). The study was conducted at 25 public surgical departments and 480 primary healthcare centers across Sweden. Between Sept 1, 1987, and Jan 31, 2001, 2,007 per-protocol patients with obesity who underwent bariatric surgery (gastric bypass, n = 266; gastric banding, n = 376; vertical banded gastroplasty, n = 1,365) and 2,040 matched controls, receiving standard nonsurgical obesity-related care, were recruited. Inclusion criteria were age 37-60 years and a body mass index (BMI) ≥34 kg/m2 for men and ≥38 kg/m2 for women. The primary outcome measures were cancer events and cancer-related deaths, captured through nearly complete data sourced from national Swedish health registries. Female-specific cancers were defined as gynecologic and breast cancers. Analyses were adjusted (adj) for baseline age, sagittal diameter, alcohol consumption, smoking, and serum insulin levels. The study was closed on December 31, 2022. Median follow-up was 26.8 years (interquartile range (IQR) [22.9, 29.6]) in the surgery group and 24.9 years (IQR [18.7, 28.8]) in the control group. Bariatric surgery was associated with a lower overall cancer incidence rate in women (adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj) = 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.67, 0.90]; p = 0.001), but not in men (sex-treatment interaction p = 0.013). The HRadj for overall cancer mortality rate in women was 0.78 (95% CI [0.61, 1.00]; p = 0.050). In women, surgery was associated with a lower incidence rate of both obesity-related cancers (HRadj = 0.70; 95% CI [0.58, 0.85]; p < 0.001) and female-specific cancers (HRadj = 0.60; 95% CI [0.47, 0.75]; p < 0.001). Importantly, subgroup analyses showed that the associations between surgery and female-specific cancer incidence, as well as female-specific cancer-related mortality, were stronger in women with high baseline insulin levels (insulin-treatment interaction p = 0.021 and 0.039, respectively). The main limitation is that cancer was not a predefined study outcome.

conclusionsBariatric surgery is associated with a lower risk of cancer and cancer-related mortality in women with obesity, with the strongest association observed for female-specific cancers in women with elevated baseline insulin levels. In men, bariatric surgery was not associated with overall cancer incidence or mortality. These findings support incorporating risk-based stratification to better tailor cancer prevention strategies in obesity care.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryNeoplasmsObesityWeight LossAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSex FactorsSwedenTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID41490246
PMCPMC12768343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.