Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41490149›Full record

ReviewCancer research2026

Emerging Strategies to Inhibit the G1/S Transition for Cancer Therapy.

Seth M Rubin, Julien Sage, Jan M Skotheim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seth M RubinDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1670-4147
Julien SageDepartments of Pediatrics and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8928-9968
Jan M SkotheimDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.ORCID 0000-0001-8420-6820

Funding

Project 3: Defining and targeting mechanisms of E2F transcription factor regulationP01CA254867 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Seth Michael Rubin, Jan M Skotheim · 2022 to 2026
$8.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA254867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At its core, cancer is a disease of uncontrolled cell proliferation mediated by perturbed molecular pathways that have been elucidated over the past few decades. Biochemical and genetic studies have identified the key molecular regulators of the transition from G1 to S phase in the cell cycle that commits cells to division. During the G1/S transition, the cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4 and CDK6 (CDK4/6) form complexes with cyclin D that phosphorylate and inhibit the retinoblastoma protein. The resulting activation of E2F transcription factors then drives progression into S phase. The centrality of the G1/S transition for proliferation motivated the development of small-molecule ATP-competitive CDK4/6 inhibitors, which block the first step of this pathway and are now standard of care for some forms of breast cancer. Although successful, these therapeutics have limitations that have motivated the development of alternative approaches to targeting CDKs and the cell cycle. Here, we review how recently developed inhibitors of CDKs and other components of the G1/S pathway may be used, as single agents or in combination therapies, to oppose the growth of human cancers.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsG1 PhaseNeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsS PhaseAnimalsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6HumansMolecular Targeted TherapyAntineoplastic AgentsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID41490149
PMCPMC13084612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.