ArticlePloS one2026
A fusion sparse learning algorithm for fault identification of rolling bearings.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A key part of CNC machine tools is the rolling bearing, and thus, it is vital to employ a data-driven approach for fault diagnosis. This paper proposes a two-stage fusion sparse learning algorithm for fault data processing that can identify and diagnose the fault types of rolling bearings based on sensor measurement data. During the feature extraction phase, temporal features of sequential data within the big data are extracted using a Long Short - Term Memory (LSTM) network. Moreover, the classification learning stage contains a new sparse learning algorithm, which applies [Formula: see text] regularization on stochastic configuration networks (SCN). The iterative learning formula combines the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) with the analysis of the quadratic equations theory. Simultaneously, the model's inequality supervision mechanism is updated based on convergence analysis. This developed algorithm incorporates the benefits of LSTM in extracting temporal data characteristics, along with the sparsity, ease of convergence, and lightweight nature of SCN. Consequently, it mitigates the shortcomings of deep models in end-to-end applications, particularly in terms of interpretability and structural redundancy, thus making it suitable for deployment on edge devices. Finally, a fusion sparse learning model (LSTM-[Formula: see text]-SCN) is introduced based on the two-stage learning algorithm for rolling bearing fault diagnosis. In the experiments on the benchmark dataset, the optimal sparsity degree of this algorithm for the Sparse Coding Network (SCN) reached 76.66%, which was 30% higher than that of the Pooling-based Sparse Coding Network (PSCN). Moreover, in the experiments based on the dataset of Case Western Reserve University (CWRU), the optimal test classification accuracy achieved was 97.51%, and the optimal sparsity degree for SCN reached 29.39%. These results verify that the proposed algorithm exhibits sparsity, demonstrates effectiveness, and is capable of identifying faults in rolling bearings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.