ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Implementation of deep learning with convolutional block attention module for detecting collimator rotation errors in stereotactic radiosurgery quality assurance.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) requires sub-millimeter accuracy, making patient-specific quality assurance (QA) essential. Conventional Gamma Index analysis is often insufficient to detect subtle collimator errors. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a convolutional neural network (CNN) enhanced with a Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) for automated error detection in SRS treatment plans. A total of 146 SRS plans were generated using the Eclipse v13.6 treatment planning system, including error-free and ± 1° collimator-rotated cases. Dose maps were extracted from DICOM RT Dose files, normalized, and augmented by flips, rotations, and Gaussian noise. Dose–volume histogram (DVH) features were also encoded. The CNN model with three convolutional blocks and CBAM was trained with stratified five-fold cross-validation and evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. Independent validation was performed on 20 real clinical cases from the 108 Military Central Hospital. The model achieved an average accuracy of 68.2% (± 3.5%) and an AUC of 0.65 (± 0.04) across cross-validation folds. On the independent clinical dataset, the best model achieved 85% accuracy, with a recall of 0.90 and an F1-score of 0.86. The CNN was able to identify subtle collimator deviations that conventional Gamma analysis might miss. A CNN with CBAM demonstrated feasibility for detecting collimator errors directly from treatment planning system (TPS) dose distributions in SRS QA. Although preliminary and limited by dataset size and single-error type, this approach shows promise as a complementary tool to conventional QA methods, with potential to improve safety and efficiency of radiosurgery in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41489764What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.