Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41489760›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2026

Circulating Vesicular Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease: From Mechanistic Insights to Clinical Applications.

Vinay Patil, Amit Sharma, Bhavin Parekh, Renuka Jyothi S, Priya Priyadarshini-Nayak, Bethanney Janney-J, Gurjant Singh, Shaker Al-Hasnaawei, Manoj Kumar-Mishra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vinay PatilSharda School of Pharmacy, Sharda University, Greater Noida, India.
Amit SharmaFaculty of Pharmacy, Gokul Global University, Sidhpur,Gujarat, India.
Bhavin ParekhCollege of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, AL-Turath University, Baghdad, Iraq.
Renuka Jyothi SDepartment of Biotechnology and Genetics, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to Be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Priya Priyadarshini-NayakDepartment of Medical Oncology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to Be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8421-3630
Bethanney Janney-JDepartment of Biomedical, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Gurjant SinghDepartment of Physiotherapy, University Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Chandigarh University, Chandigarh State, Punjab, India.
Shaker Al-HasnaaweiCollege of Pharmacy, the Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.
Manoj Kumar-MishraCentre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140401, Punjab, India. biopolymer714@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is moving toward earlier, biology-driven diagnosis, which increases the need for blood-based markers that are reliable, scalable, and interpretable across populations. This review integrates the AT(N) framework with a maturity model for circulating biomarkers. We first describe core and largely validated plasma measures, including LC-MS or automated immunoassay Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios, p tau217 and p tau231, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light, and we relate them to recent multi-stakeholder recommendations on analytical performance and regulatory status. We then summarize replicated but context-dependent markers, such as soluble TREM receptors, CHI3L1, and MCP 1, which improve risk stratification when interpreted together with amyloid and tau. A separate section examines emerging readouts that capture central nervous system (CNS) processes indirectly, focusing on neuron-enriched extracellular vesicles (EVs) and EV-carried microRNA panels. These signatures are biologically plausible and often precede symptoms, although current datasets are small, Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI)-based, and require standardized pre-analytical handling and external validation before clinical triage can be recommended. We also discuss platform selection, comparing automated electrochemiluminescence (ECL) and single-molecule assays with LC-MS, and outline how composite plasma panels that include APOE genotype can support screen-confirm-monitor workflows in memory clinics. Finally, we propose a tiered implementation path in which genomic risk profiling and blood tests identify candidates for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or positron emission tomography (PET) studies. This shows how circulating and multi-omics biomarkers can be layered onto established plasma Amyloid beta (Aβ) and p tau assays to widen the measurable blood space in Alzheimer's disease.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersExtracellular VesiclesAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsHumansAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseAβ42/Aβ40Blood-based biomarkersNeurofilament light (NfL)P-tau217

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.