ArticleOdontology2026
Is air abrasion effective as a surface pretreatment for enamel, dentin, and IDS-treated dentin?
Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of air abrasion with different abrasive particles on the surface roughness and bond strength of resin-based luting agents to enamel and dentin, including dentin surfaces treated with immediate dentin sealing (IDS). Bovine teeth were used, and four types of substrates were prepared: enamel, untreated dentin, dentin treated with IDS using an adhesive, and dentin treated with IDS using a resin composite. Air abrasion was performed using aluminum oxide (29 µm, 53 µm) or bioactive glass at 0.3 MPa for 10 s from a 10-mm distance prior to the bonding procedure. Acid-etched enamel specimens were included for comparison. A 2.4 mm cylindrical mold was set on the surface and filled with resin-based luting agents, followed by light curing. Surface roughness (Ra) after the surface pretreatments, and the shear bond strength were evaluated. The number of repetitions was set to 15. Statistical analyses were conducted using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). Acid etching produced the highest bond strength on enamel, although air abrasion with 29-µm alumina resulted in comparable values. In contrast, air abrasion increased surface roughness but did not enhance bond strength on either untreated dentin or IDS-treated dentin, regardless of whether an adhesive or resin composite was used. These findings suggest that while 29-µm alumina abrasion is a viable alternative to acid etching on enamel when acid use is contraindicated, its effectiveness appears to be substrate-dependent and may not facilitate improved bonding to dentin or IDS-treated dentin despite increased roughness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41489675What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.