Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41489675›Full record

ArticleOdontology2026

Is air abrasion effective as a surface pretreatment for enamel, dentin, and IDS-treated dentin?

Kentaro Nakajima, Yoshiki Ishida, Daisuke Miura, Yasuhiro Hotta, Akikazu Shinya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kentaro NakajimaDepartment of Dental Materials Science, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan.
Yoshiki IshidaDepartment of Dental Materials Science, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8686-3215
Daisuke MiuraDepartment of Dental Materials Science, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan.
Yasuhiro HottaDepartment of Dental Materials Science, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan.
Akikazu ShinyaDepartment of Dental Materials Science, School of Life Dentistry at Tokyo, The Nippon Dental University, 1-9-20 Fujimi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-8159, Japan. akishi@tky.ndu.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of air abrasion with different abrasive particles on the surface roughness and bond strength of resin-based luting agents to enamel and dentin, including dentin surfaces treated with immediate dentin sealing (IDS). Bovine teeth were used, and four types of substrates were prepared: enamel, untreated dentin, dentin treated with IDS using an adhesive, and dentin treated with IDS using a resin composite. Air abrasion was performed using aluminum oxide (29 µm, 53 µm) or bioactive glass at 0.3 MPa for 10 s from a 10-mm distance prior to the bonding procedure. Acid-etched enamel specimens were included for comparison. A 2.4 mm cylindrical mold was set on the surface and filled with resin-based luting agents, followed by light curing. Surface roughness (Ra) after the surface pretreatments, and the shear bond strength were evaluated. The number of repetitions was set to 15. Statistical analyses were conducted using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). Acid etching produced the highest bond strength on enamel, although air abrasion with 29-µm alumina resulted in comparable values. In contrast, air abrasion increased surface roughness but did not enhance bond strength on either untreated dentin or IDS-treated dentin, regardless of whether an adhesive or resin composite was used. These findings suggest that while 29-µm alumina abrasion is a viable alternative to acid etching on enamel when acid use is contraindicated, its effectiveness appears to be substrate-dependent and may not facilitate improved bonding to dentin or IDS-treated dentin despite increased roughness.

Indexed as

Air Abrasion, DentalDental EnamelDentinAcid Etching, DentalAnimalsCattleComposite ResinsDental BondingDentin-Bonding AgentsMaterials TestingShear StrengthSurface PropertiesComposite ResinsDentin-Bonding AgentsAir abrasionImmediate dentin sealingMinimal intervention dentistryResin luting agentsShear bond strength

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.