ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2026
Same-sex sexual behavior in a male-dimorphic arachnid with a resource-defense polygyny: evidence for female mimicry?
Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chemical Secretion Use Varies Among Species but Lacks a Straightforward Relationship With Other Defenses in Neotropical Opiliones.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Female mimicry is a reproductive tactic typically employed by small males (minors) in species with female- or resource-defense polygyny. By mimicking females, minors may secure copulations without being detected by territorial males (majors). We used three complementary approaches to investigate the possibility of female mimicry in the male-dimorphic harvestman Serracutisoma proximum, a chemically-oriented arachnid with a resource-defense mating system. Minors rely primarily on sneak copulations, and if they exhibit female mimicry, we expect them to elicit behavioral responses from majors similar to those directed toward females. Indeed, a field experiment showed that majors displayed reduced aggression toward minors and even attempted copulation with some of them. To examine the mechanisms underlying of mistaken sex identification, we compared the cuticular chemical profiles of majors, minors, and females, and quantified the density of chemoreceptors on the sensory legs of majors and minors. Contrary to female mimicry predictions, the overall chemical profile of minors did not resemble that of females. However, some compounds that signal female reproductive status in spiders showed similar abundances in minors and females. Additionally, chemoreceptor density did not differ between majors and minors, suggesting that mistaken sex identification is also not due to sensory limitations in majors. In conclusion, while behavioral evidence is consistent with female mimicry, the underlying mechanisms remain unresolved. Regardless of the underlying mechanism, the ability of some minors to access and mate with females even in the presence of majors likely confers reproductive advantages, which could maintain alternative reproductive tactics within the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41489669What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.