Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41489669›Full record

ArticleDie Naturwissenschaften2026

Same-sex sexual behavior in a male-dimorphic arachnid with a resource-defense polygyny: evidence for female mimicry?

Diego Solano-Brenes, Cláudia M Furlan, Rafael C da Silva, Rodrigo H Willemart, Fábio S Nascimento, Glauco Machado

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Naturwissenschaften, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diego Solano-BrenesPrograma de Pós‑graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, Rua do Matão, trav. 14, no. 321, São Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil. solanobrenes.de@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3603-2947
Cláudia M FurlanLaboratório de Fitoquímica, Departamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6180-1034
Rafael C da SilvaCNRS, INRAE, IRD, Institut d'Écologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2674-8976
Rodrigo H WillemartLaboratório de Ecologia Sensorial e Comportamento de Aracnídeos, Escola de Artes, Ciências e Humanidades, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4446-597X
Fábio S NascimentoDepartamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3731-7111
Glauco MachadoLAGE do Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0321-128X

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 302188/2022-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/00915-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2021/03200-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female mimicry is a reproductive tactic typically employed by small males (minors) in species with female- or resource-defense polygyny. By mimicking females, minors may secure copulations without being detected by territorial males (majors). We used three complementary approaches to investigate the possibility of female mimicry in the male-dimorphic harvestman Serracutisoma proximum, a chemically-oriented arachnid with a resource-defense mating system. Minors rely primarily on sneak copulations, and if they exhibit female mimicry, we expect them to elicit behavioral responses from majors similar to those directed toward females. Indeed, a field experiment showed that majors displayed reduced aggression toward minors and even attempted copulation with some of them. To examine the mechanisms underlying of mistaken sex identification, we compared the cuticular chemical profiles of majors, minors, and females, and quantified the density of chemoreceptors on the sensory legs of majors and minors. Contrary to female mimicry predictions, the overall chemical profile of minors did not resemble that of females. However, some compounds that signal female reproductive status in spiders showed similar abundances in minors and females. Additionally, chemoreceptor density did not differ between majors and minors, suggesting that mistaken sex identification is also not due to sensory limitations in majors. In conclusion, while behavioral evidence is consistent with female mimicry, the underlying mechanisms remain unresolved. Regardless of the underlying mechanism, the ability of some minors to access and mate with females even in the presence of majors likely confers reproductive advantages, which could maintain alternative reproductive tactics within the population.

Indexed as

ArachnidaBiological MimicrySexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMaleSex CharacteristicsAlternative reproductive tacticsChemical mimicryChemoreceptorsCuticular hydrocarbonsSexual deception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.