Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41489667›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2026

Techniques for Cervical Laminoplasty.

Newton Cho, Ankit I Mehta, Aditya Vedantam, C Rory Goodwin, Uzondu F Agochukwu, Lukas Grassner, Aria Nouri, Bizhan Aarabi, Jefferson R Wilson, Nathan Evaniew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Newton ChoCombined Orthopedic and Neurosurgery Spine Program, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8715-611X
Ankit I MehtaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6931-6095
Aditya VedantamDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5212-0640
C Rory GoodwinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Spine Division, Duke Medical Center University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6540-2751
Uzondu F AgochukwuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, GA, USA.
Lukas GrassnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Christian Doppler Clinic, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria.
Aria NouriDivision of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4965-3059
Bizhan AarabiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jefferson R WilsonDivision of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nathan EvaniewCombined Orthopedic and Neurosurgery Spine Program, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study DesignNarrative review.ObjectiveThe objective of this review was to discuss the various surgical techniques and developments in cervical laminoplasty and outline any reported differences in outcomes between the different techniques used.MethodsA PubMed literature search was performed using the terms "expansive", "open door laminoplasty", "cervical", "double door laminoplasty", "French door laminoplasty", and "endoscopic". All articles written or translated into English were considered and synthesized to provide a narrative overview of cervical laminoplasty techniques.ResultsCervical laminoplasty techniques can be categorized either into "open door" or "double door" ("French door") laminoplasty. Several iterations of each technique to address long-term closure of the laminoplasty, muscle preservation, and migration of bone grafts have been developed. There are no consistent reported differences in outcomes in the literature between the 2 techniques for individuals with degenerative cervical myelopathy.ConclusionsCervical laminoplasty is an effective surgical technique to expand canal size and achieve spinal cord decompression in the context of degenerative cervical myelopathy secondary to spondylosis or OPLL. Both the "open door" and "double door" laminoplasty techniques generally provide equivalent outcomes. Minimally invasive techniques including endoscopic approaches also continue to evolve, and future research comparing all approaches is warranted.

Indexed as

cervical laminoplastymotion preservationsurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID41489667
PMCPMC12868579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.