ArticlePediatric surgery international2026
The impact of urologic transitional care program on change in transition readiness and healthcare resource utilization among adolescent patients with congenital urogenital conditions needing lifelong care.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAdvances in pediatric healthcare have improved survival rates of congenital urogenital conditions, emphasizing the need for effective transition programs from pediatric to adult care. However, transition challenges often lead to suboptimal outcomes. This study evaluated a structured urologic transitional care program's impact on transition readiness and healthcare resource utilization in a single-payer healthcare system.
methodsA retrospective comparative study included 106 patients aged 12-21 with congenital urogenital conditions. The intervention group (n = 53) participated in a urologic transitional care program, while the control group (n = 53) received standard care. Transition readiness was assessed using the Good2Go questionnaire, evaluating self-advocacy, knowledge, self-care, and social support. Healthcare resource utilization was measured through emergency room (ER) visits, admissions, and complications.
resultsAt baseline, transition readiness scores showed no significant differences between groups, although higher ER-to-admission ratios were observed in the intervention group. Post-intervention, the intervention group demonstrated significant improvements in knowledge readiness (mean difference: +12.78, p = 0.005) and reductions in ER visits (mean difference: - 0.64, p = 0.022) and admissions (mean difference: - 0.28, p = 0.007) compared to controls. Difference-in-differences analysis confirmed significant improvements in knowledge readiness in the intervention group, although reductions in all ER metrics were inconclusive.
conclusionsThe urologic transitional care program effectively enhanced knowledge readiness and possibly reduced ER visits among adolescents with congenital urogenital conditions. These findings underscore the importance of structured interventions to support successful transitions. Additional strategies are needed to address other readiness domains, healthcare resource utilization and the sustainability of long-term benefits. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: This study was not registered in a clinical trials registry as it is a retrospective observational study. IRB study approval granted by UAB # 300012178; SickKids REB # 1000079219.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41489647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.