ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Necrotizing fasciitis, part 2 : Differential diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is known to be a potentially life-threatening bacterial infection of the deep fascias showing a tendency to rapid spread. For certain localizations (e.g., the scrotum or labia) of this disease, specific entities have been defined (e.g., Fournier's gangrene). Cellulitis (or phlegmon) represents the most important differential diagnosis of NF. Moreover, septic soft tissue infections with fascial involvement together with eosinophilic and paraneoplastic fasciitis can be diagnostically challenging. The large group of autoimmunologically mediated inflammatory systemic disorders (such as lupus myofasciitis) at least shares some radiological similarities, although both its bilateral and partially symmetrical involvement pattern as well as the overall clinical constellation would argue against it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41489628What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.