Beyond integration: towards benchmarks for developmental potential in human stem cell-derived embryo models.

backgroundStem cell-based embryo models (SCBEMs) are clusters of pluripotent stem cells that can mimic morphological and functional aspects of early human embryos to different degrees. When cultured from human cells, SCBEMs offer technically scalable and amenable tools that can help refine, reduce, and, in the future, perhaps replace the use of animals and human embryos in fundamental and clinical research. These advantages propelled the development of SCBEMs, and several distinct types have been generated over the past decade, including gastruloids, axioloids, blastoids, and post-implantation-like embryoids. For purposes of governance, advisory reports distinguish between SCBEMs based on their presumed capacity to continuously undergo organized human development-referred to here as developmental potential. However, since functionally testing this potential by transferring human SCBEMs to a uterus would be unethical and is recommended to be prohibited, scientists lack clear or consistent ways to assess it. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This narrative review aims to tackle the question of how to assess developmental potential in SCBEMs by clarifying the different ways in which it can be and is being conceptualized. We achieve this by synthesizing insights from governance, science, and ethics. First, we examine how developmental potential is described in contemporary governance frameworks, and which aspects are emphasized. Next, we discuss biological markers for developmental potential and show how their scientific basis (in embryos, let alone SCBEMs) remains poorly understood. Then, we explore how the aspects considered relevant for assessments of developmental potential in governance and science may pre-emptively hinge on underlying conceptual interpretations and lead to differing normative implications. SEARCH

methodsThis narrative review combines insights from both the academic and grey literature on the (ethics of) embryo models. Original and review articles were selected from PubMed and Biorxiv with the main focus on articles published since 2015. Search terms included: embryo quality, in vitro fertilization, Gardner system, blastoid, gastruloid, embryo research, potentiality argument, developmental potential, transcriptomics, epigenetics, embryo metabolism, and related terms. Additional sources were identified through snowballing. This work focuses predominantly on human SCBEMs, but references to animal models are made. OUTCOMES: Comparison of the descriptions currently recommended for governance suggests at least three criteria that are used to assess developmental potential in SCBEMs: composition, organization, and interaction. Scientifically, developmental potential is multifaceted and only partly characterized, making it necessary to measure a broader range of aspects, using human embryos as benchmarks when possible. Since the range and significance of these aspects can be shaped by underlying accounts of developmental potential, contemporary advisory reports are examined to explore if and how they connote interpretations of developmental potential as possibility, probability, and predisposition. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Categorization of the regulatory and scientific criteria currently used to assess developmental potential shows that they are underpinned by distinct interpretations of the concept, revealing tensions and questions for further inquiry. By synthesizing insights from governance, science, and ethics, this review thus aims to contribute to the responsible advancement of the SCBEM field and to support its coherent and transparent governance. REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.