ArticleBlood2026
Time of day of CAR T-cell infusion and outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma.
Article in Blood, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model-Based Analysis with Mechanistic Insights to CAR-T-Cell Therapy Kinetics: Case Study with Axicabtagene Ciloleucel and Brexucabtagene Autoleucel.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Circadian rhythm-guided cellular therapy in hematologic malignancies: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and optimization strategies.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Circadian engineering of in vivo CAR T cell therapy for precision oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Time-of-day of first checkpoint inhibitor dose influences clinical outcomes and immune responses in hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Article
- Circadian control of immune homeostasis in cardiovascular health and disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
43 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractCircadian rhythms orchestrate immune activation and effector function, yet whether within-day timing influences chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy outcomes remains unknown. We conducted an international, multicenter retrospective study of 1052 adults with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy across 7 centers (2017-2025). The median infusion time was 11:48 am (interquartile range, 11:06 am to 12:45 pm). Each hour later in infusion time was associated with an increased risk of progression, relapse, or death (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.20; P = .004) after adjustment for center, product, and key clinical variables. One-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 51.4% for early (before 12:00 noon) infusion vs 35.2% for late (at or after 12:00 noon) infusion, whereas overall survival was similar between groups. The PFS benefit was driven by lower relapse and higher complete response rates in the early infusion group. Although no differences were observed in immune toxicities, late infusion correlated with higher peak inflammatory markers and reduced day 7 CAR T-cell expansion. Together, these findings suggest that the timing of CAR T-cell infusion may influence therapeutic efficacy and support prospective evaluation of circadian-informed delivery strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.