ReviewmBio2026
mGem: AAV, from almost a virus to an awesome vector-or is it?
Review in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors in Gene Therapy: Mechanisms of Toxicity, Clinical Risks, and Strategies for Their Minimization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Fecal AAV8 shedding and co-housing reduces EAE disease severity: implications for preclinical study design.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors have taken center stage for gene therapy and have shown clinical efficacy in 15 human diseases to date. The Food and Drug Administration has approved seven AAV "drugs" for one-time treatment respectively for Leber's congenital amaurosis, spinal muscular atrophy, hemophilia B, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, hemophilia A, and aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency. Despite these remarkable developments, it has become increasingly clear that the first generation of AAV vectors is less than optimal since in most, if not all, cases, exceedingly high doses are needed to achieve clinical efficacy, and as a consequence, in some patients, serious adverse events have been observed, and to date, at least 21 patients have died. Thus, there is a need to reassess the limitations of the first generation of AAV vectors as well as an urgent need to develop the next generation of AAV vectors that are safe and effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.