ReviewJournal of Brown hospital medicine2025
Improving Patient Experience in Healthcare.
Review in Journal of Brown hospital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers to continuity of outpatient infusion-port maintenance among patients with cancer: a single-center cross-sectional study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Exploring the Mental Well-being of Hospitalized Patients: Survey Findings to Inform Future Supportive Interventions.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient experience has become a central dimension of healthcare quality, influencing safety, trust, adherence, and long-term engagement. It spans the patient journey across critical touchpoints-admission, hospitalization, environment, and discharge-highlighting opportunities to improve care delivery. First impressions during admission shape trust, as respectful interactions and clear orientation correlate with higher satisfaction and likelihood-to-recommend scores. Communication throughout hospitalization remains the most influential factor; empathy, active listening, and structured bedside reporting consistently enhance perceptions of clinician competence and compassion. The hospital environment-including cleanliness, reduced noise, and access to natural light-affects patients' sense of safety, dignity, and recovery. Discharge represents a pivotal transition in which structured education, culturally tailored planning, and follow-up calls reduce readmissions and strengthen preparedness for self-care. Importantly, patient experience varies across populations, with disparities by race, language, and socioeconomic status. Addressing these differences requires cross-cultural communication, interpreter services, and shared decision-making that respect patient values and beliefs. Measurement approaches also warrant reconsideration. While the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey provides essential benchmarks, its delayed recall and fixed-response design may limit insights into trust, communication, and emotional safety. Patient experience should be recognized not merely as a compliance requirement but as an ethical and strategic imperative. Sustainable improvement depends on investment in staff training, inclusive design, and systems that embed empathy and cultural responsiveness as core elements of high-quality, patient-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.