Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41489220›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2025

Humanization of care in forensic mental health wards: a qualitative study.

Sylvie Anna Sollied, Monica Evelyn Kvande

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sylvie Anna SolliedDepartment of Health and Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9991-734X
Monica Evelyn KvandeDepartment for Postgraduate Studies, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4384-4695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore nurses' experiences related to humanizing care in high-security forensic units.

methodsThis study has a qualitative design. Data consist of texts from study involved nine interviews with nurses working in two forensic mental health wards in Norway. The text was interpreted and analysed using Lindseth and Nordberg's phenomenological-hermeneutical method.

resultsThrough an interpretation process, three themes emerged: "Openness and responsiveness to patients' stories"; "Attention to patients' individual needs"; and "Humanistic care in strict environments".

conclusionNurses' presence and caring attitudes in everyday forensic psychiatric care activities provide insights into individual patients' lived experiences, vulnerability, fragility and tolerance limit. The ability to see and listen to patients at the human level and meet and respect patients in human fellowships is essential for care humanization. Additionally, the nurses in our study highlighted the need for nurses to feel safe and closely collaborate within professional healthcare teams.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelForensic PsychiatryHumanismMental DisordersNurse-Patient RelationsPsychiatric Department, HospitalPsychiatric NursingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayQualitative ResearchencountersForensic psychiatric carehumanizingnursingqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID41489220
PMCPMC11703350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.