SynthesisNursing open2026
Critical Care Nurses' Perceptions and Experiences of the Organ Donation Process: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Critical Care Nurses' Perceptions and Experiences of the Organ Donation Process: A Systematic Review.Nursing open · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo describe critical care nurses' perceptions and experiences of the organ donation process. DESIGN AND
methodsA systematic review with a literature search in CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO was conducted between 2009-2024 and reported by the PRISMA guidelines. 14 qualitative studies were assessed for relevance and methodological quality. Data were extracted by two of the researchers. A quality appraisal was performed according to a review template, first individually and then discussed in the research group. The analysis followed an interpretative synthesis, in three steps: coding, developing descriptive themes and generating analytical themes.
resultsFour themes were identified: lack of knowledge, work environment, meeting with relatives and nurse's challenges. The nurses described that caring for a potential organ donor was complex. The nurses' general lack of knowledge about organ donation led to stress and feelings of uncertainty, which in turn created limitations in the donation process. Nurses identified several challenges with the organ donation process.
conclusionThe staff found the organ donation process challenging on various levels. There was a significant need for crisis processing for all professionals involved in the donation process. IMPLICATIONS: Addressing the knowledge gap through clear guidelines and internal training to enhance the organ donation process. Providing time for debriefing can help manage strain on professionals. IMPACT: This study highlights the critical need for improved education and emotional support for critical care nurses. Implementing these changes can lead to more efficient and compassionate organ donation processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.