ArticleAging & mental health2026
A qualitative evaluation of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health in Vietnam (REACH VN) intervention: a multi-stakeholder perspective.
Article in Aging & mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe primary goal of this study was to understand attitudes and experiences of a culturally tailored dementia intervention for Vietnamese family caregivers of people living with dementia (PLWD) from the perspectives of family caregivers and other stakeholders.
methodWe conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 53 stakeholders (i.e. family caregivers, interventionists and their supervisors, and other staff and local officials) with direct or indirect knowledge of the intervention, which was delivered in the home over three months by local interventionists. Directed content analysis of the qualitative interview data was performed to identify themes and sub-themes.
resultsThe process-oriented themes suggest that caregivers and interventionists encountered multiple barriers during the intervention process, and amid these challenges, face-to-face intervention was highly preferred among caregivers, and among multiple intervention components, some worked better for caregivers than others. The outcome-oriented themes highlight that participating in the intervention benefited not only caregivers but also health professionals, particularly the interventionists.
conclusionResults highlight the need for further cultural modifications in problem-solving and mood management components, and the potential of the blended format of face-to-face and phone interventions to better fit the sociocultural context and cognitive capacity of most Vietnamese caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.